Compared to the Amiga versions which was the dogs bollocks. But again sometimes the PC conversions really did suck major. But as other people said, later on the Amiga to PC conversions became much better, such as Superfrog and Project X. That is the short answer, a long answer is not what I can give right now. Can that be possible in a forum full of DOS gamers?!īoth yes and no. It seems to me that many of the people here are saying that some games are bad just because of the graphics and sound. Well done! You don't know these games, but you know the Amiga versions are crappy, compared to the PC ports. Hail WinUAE+WHDLoad! ( ĮDIT: abyss again shows us his ignorance, and his one-track-mind. WinUAE is very well developed, and it's a pleasure to play the classics. Where Amiga titles featured silky-smooth scrolling, the PC games would yerk around horribly. On the other hand, it was hard to find a smooth-scrolling game on the PC. I saw it on a _very_ expensive PC system, and it completely blew the Amiga version (which wasn't out at the time) away graphics-wise.

I remember the first game that made me want a PC was Wing Commander. An example would be Gods - the Bitmap Brothers were practically married to the Amiga, knowing every programming trick. Ports are very often inferior to the originals - this is still true today. The video is a bit unfair - the guy that made it picked some games that were Amiga originals, and were ported to the PC afterwards.

Amiga emulator mac vs pc